I've worked on a 4 vessel 10 bbl, and a 2 vessel 50 bbl. I greatly preferred the 4 vessel set up. Takes up some extra floorspace, but I think that it gives you much more flexibility, especially if you're going to do multiple styles.
Bill
Do any craft brewers here use a 4 vessel brewhouse? I am looking at opening a brewery in the very near future, and am torn between a 2 vessel(which seems to be the norm for craft breweries) or a 4 vessel system. I have seen larger breweries like Laguinitas and Stone use 4 vessel systems, it seems to be more efficient and a better use of inventory space than a larger 2 vessel system. Any input on this subject would be helpful.
I've worked on a 4 vessel 10 bbl, and a 2 vessel 50 bbl. I greatly preferred the 4 vessel set up. Takes up some extra floorspace, but I think that it gives you much more flexibility, especially if you're going to do multiple styles.
Bill
That is the same conclusion that I have come to as well, and I'm willing to need a little more space for the added flexibility and process efficiency.
Have you considered a 3 vessel brewhouse for your start up? Remember cash is king when opening a business, especially a brewery. Don't over extend yourself. I went with a 3 vessel brewhouse and an oversized HLT and CLT so I could brew all day with no water issues. This is probably the most cost-efficent way to open a brewery because should open with room to grow on your brewhouse meaning you only need larger tanks or more of them to grow, and not a new brewhouse.
Can you go into details of the flexibility? I would think the multi vessel BH would be far more advantageous if you were planning on brewing around the clock, and far cheaper to go with a two for a new brewery.
On the three vessel BH, which three did you go with?
Joel Halbleib
VP of Operations / Zymurgist
Bluegrass Brewing Co
636 East Main St
Louisville, KY
www.bluegrassbrewing.com
I went with a mash / lauter tun, kettle, and whirlpool. With this set up the first beer takes the longest then each brew after the first takes about 3 hours. I can brew 5 batches a day with this set up. The HLT is 2.5 times the size of the brewhouse with a single stage heat exchanger so the CLT (2 times the size of the brewhouse) water coming out of the heat exchanger is around 150F and goes directly back into the steam powered HLT. Highly efficent as far as time and water usage.
Cheers
Originally Posted by Trickster
if you have a MLT/BK/WH and a HLT and CLT wouldn't this be a 5 vessel brewhouse?
Scott LaFollette
Blank Slate Brewing Company
Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by jebzter
All depends on what your goals are in sales of your beers
If you like to discuss this further, please contact me
Thanks
Fred
Fred.scheer@kronesusa.com
if I understand it correctly, the HLT and CLT aren't considered part of the brew system's count of tanks. only the MT/LT, BK, and Whirlpool would be. soOriginally Posted by yap
2 vessel usually means MLT and BK/WP
3 vessel is some other combination like MLT, BK and WP or MT, LT, BK/WP.
4 vessel is MT, LT, BK, and WP.
From what I've seen in my limited experience![]()
~Phil
Only the wort/malt handling hot vessels are considered for the brewhouse vessels number. HLT and CLT don't count. Besides increased throughput per given time period, having a mash mixer in the brewhouse allows for easy step mashes and most importantly, a relatively homogenous temperature throughout the entire mash. Some brewers use steam jackets in a mash/lauter tun to do step mashes. While this works to some extent, it is by no means ideal, as the rakes are not designed to mix the mash. You also force a bunch of flour under the screens doing this. Trying a whirlpool in a 30 BBL brew kettle with an internal colandria is challenging. 15-20 BBL without any internal fixtures is about as big as you can go and still be somewhat effective at removing your wort without a pile of trub to boot. As said previously, extra vessels add a chunk to your initial start-up cost, and your ancillary equipment will be expensive no matter how you slice it.
______________________
Jamie Fulton
Community Beer Co.
Dallas, Texas
"Beer for the Greater Good"
The flexibility I am speaking of is that if I wanted to do a smaller volume of certain beer, then I am limited to the smallest batch size that I can do and still have an appropriate depth of my mash. So I may have to do double and triple batches for my high volume sellers in a smaller 4 vessel system, but could do a smaller batch of a limited run beer. Where as I could buy a larger 2 vessel system, that works for my high volume brews, but is too much for my limited run stuff.
Yeah I know that's "technically" how you're supposed to count them. I guess its just a personal thing that always kind of bugged me. Try making beer without a HLT and/or CLT. It isn't easy (but yes I know it can be done). If you are trying to budget for a start-up then you have to account for them whether you call them part of the "brewhouse" or not...Originally Posted by Pompeiisneaks
Sorry. Just being picky I guess....
Scott LaFollette
Blank Slate Brewing Company
Cincinnati, Ohio
Try to make beer without a fermenter and a bright tank too, y'know...
Perhaps the way to think it is the liquor tanks can be used for other processes in the brewery (such as blend water for CIP). Then they're not part of the brewhouse.
"limited experience" my @$$Originally Posted by Pompeiisneaks
Cheers to you Phil!
Jeff Schrag
Mother's Brewing Co.
Springfield, Missouri
Most three vessel systems that I've seen are Mash Mixer/Brew Kettle, Lauter, and Whirlpool. Typical German setup. This is my personal favorite as you can do just about any type of mash you want. Very flexible. Efficient. Precise.
Phillip Kelm
Palau Brewing Company