Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Alcopop Crackdown?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    1,566

    Alcopop Crackdown?

    California would tax drinks flavored with spirits as liquor instead of beer

    California authorities have moved to reclassify sweet alcoholic drinks flavored with spirits - generally known as "alcopops" - as liquor instead of beer, a decision that could boost taxes on the drinks from 20 cents per gallon to $3.30.

    Drinks such as Smirnoff Ice, Mike's Hard Lemonade and Bacardi Silver would cost as much as $2 more per six-pack if the State Board of Equalization changes its classification of the drinks from beer to distilled spirits.

    California would be only the second state to treat "alcopops" as hard liquor. Maine was the first.

    Controller Steve Westly, a member of the Board, said he is confident that will happen next year after several months of public hearings.

    "When you're selling a product that is flavored with distilled spirits, that you're marketing as distilled spirits, I think common sense dictates that it should be taxed as distilled spirits," said Westly. "I see no public policy rationale why we should provide a lower tax rate to companies that are promoting distilled spirits to young people in California."

    Last month Santa Clara County sued the state tax collection agency to force it to raise taxes on "alcopops," contending that the marketing of the drinks targets teenagers. The suit also claimed that California loses more than $40 million a year because the drinks are taxed as a beer.

    The change also would remove the products from an estimated 24,000 retailers that hold licenses to sell only beer and wine.

    A spokesman for Westly said the suit had little to do with putting the matter before the Equalization Board and that Westly had been thinking about the issue for a while.

    There are also national implications: Only Maine now taxes the beverages as distilled spirits, but attorneys general around the country have been weighing a change.

    The tax board's action kicks off a public hearing process that will last at least nine months before staff members bring recommendations to the board for a final vote.

    "It's a move to gather the facts," said Gary Galanis, vice president of corporate relations for Diageo, owner of the Smirnoff brand.

    He argued that the beverages should be classified as beer because they are derived from a malt base. The beer color and taste are stripped away, and distilled spirits added.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Pittston, PA.
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by admin
    He argued that the beverages should be classified as beer because they are derived from a malt base. The beer color and taste are stripped away, and distilled spirits added.
    This used to be a thin fiction, the malt base contributed a tiny portion of the alcohol content. But I thought the TTB cracked down on this, and they now have to be mostly malt-based??

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1
    This used to be a thin fiction, the malt base contributed a tiny portion of the alcohol content. But I thought the TTB cracked down on this, and they now have to be mostly malt-based??

    The TTB did crack down on this. At least 51% of the alcohol has to come from a fermented (not distilled) source. So they are now mostly malt based.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •