PDA

View Full Version : Minimum equipment investment for 3.5 or 7BBL system



Oly-brew
10-01-2015, 04:11 PM
Hi, I'm looking at a potential Nano / tasting room set-up with some retail frontage. Most of my volume will be contract so this will be for R&D, brand exposure and tasting.

I am thinking about a 3.5 or 7bbl set-up. I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts about minimum equipment investment. Obviously this is a pretty ambiguous question, but I'm trying to size it up right now so any ballpark guestimates are welcome.

On my radar:
Mash Tun
Boiler
2x Fermenter
Brite tank
Glycol setup
HWT
Pumps, Hoses
Sinks
Gas boiler vent
Walk-in refer

What i will worry about later is on-site work like floor drains, electrical, taps, seating, etc.

Thanks! Again any help much appreciated.

ChesterBrew
10-02-2015, 04:06 AM
If you're looking at contract brews, definitely consider a 7+bbl system if that's what you plan to use for that purpose. I don't see how a company can plan to make a profit on a smaller system than that... the only way our 3bbl purchase has made financial sense is planning to stay out of distribution altogether and focus on sales in our tasting room.

Oly-brew
10-02-2015, 08:10 AM
No- I will contract out the majority of my volume to a contract brewery that is much bigger. The nano will be for tasting room, R&D, smaller batch styles. If that makes sense. I am still leaning 7Bbl however.

a10t2
10-02-2015, 09:32 AM
If you have two fermenters, your system is grossly oversized. How much beer do you plan to sell in the taproom? (Bear in mind that it will probably be less expensive to buy kegs from the production brewery for those beers.) A 7 bbl system with serving tanks can easily move 1500 bbl/year. That's really too big to be a practical pilot system though. Even on a 3.5 bbl batch you're looking at dumping a thousand dollars' worth of ingredients/labor if something doesn't sell.

Oly-brew
10-02-2015, 10:14 AM
That's a good point. At 3.5bbl i could still put out 7 kegs / brew cycle for limited / seasonal while leaving the higher volume labels to contractor.